<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletions made by the learned CIT(A) on various grounds, except for the issue pertaining to the addition of Rs.40 crores, which was remanded back to the learned CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure on repairs to plant and machinery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 22:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 838 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletions made by the learned CIT(A) on various grounds, except for the issue pertaining to the addition of Rs.40 crores, which was remanded back to the learned CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure on repairs to plant and machinery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>