<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423989</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, reversing the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A). The ITAT emphasized that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the unsecured loan and related interest expenditure. The reopening of the assessment was deemed valid, but the primary additions under section 68 and the disallowance of interest were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423989</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, reversing the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A). The ITAT emphasized that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of the unsecured loan and related interest expenditure. The reopening of the assessment was deemed valid, but the primary additions under section 68 and the disallowance of interest were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>