<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 822 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of Education cess, Secondary and Higher Education cess, and Krishi Kalyan cess under CENVAT credit, despite policy decisions against utilizing accumulated cess credit post-phase-out. Relying on precedents like Emami Cement Ltd. and Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized CENVAT credit as a vested right and granted the refund claim, setting aside the rejection and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 822 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of Education cess, Secondary and Higher Education cess, and Krishi Kalyan cess under CENVAT credit, despite policy decisions against utilizing accumulated cess credit post-phase-out. Relying on precedents like Emami Cement Ltd. and Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized CENVAT credit as a vested right and granted the refund claim, setting aside the rejection and providing consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>