https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423979 The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, finding the appellant entitled to Cenvat credit on the challan used for depositing service tax under the reverse charge mechanism, in accordance with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision clarified the distinction between Rule 9(1)(bb) and Rule 9(1)(e) in determining eligibility for Cenvat credit in cases of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism. en-us Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:38:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423979 The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, finding the appellant entitled to Cenvat credit on the challan used for depositing service tax under the reverse charge mechanism, in accordance with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The decision clarified the distinction between Rule 9(1)(bb) and Rule 9(1)(e) in determining eligibility for Cenvat credit in cases of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423979