<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1931 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302809</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal of the assessee due to a short payment of appeal fees. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order regarding disallowance of deductions under Section 57 was also dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, noting the lack of new evidence from the Revenue to counter the CIT&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1931 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302809</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the appeal of the assessee due to a short payment of appeal fees. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (Appeals) order regarding disallowance of deductions under Section 57 was also dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT (Appeals) decision, noting the lack of new evidence from the Revenue to counter the CIT&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>