<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases from suspicious hawala dealers. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing thorough evidence to support transactions and the consistent application of judicial precedents in determining additions related to suspicious dealings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of 12.5% of the alleged bogus purchases from suspicious hawala dealers. The decision emphasized the necessity of providing thorough evidence to support transactions and the consistent application of judicial precedents in determining additions related to suspicious dealings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>