<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1792 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302812</link>
    <description>Section 276CC applies where an assessee fails to furnish a return within the prescribed time; where the return was filed belatedly but before sanction for prosecution under Section 279, and the return was later accepted and assessed, the statutory basis for launching and continuing prosecution was absent. On the admitted facts, the premise for sanction was incorrect, so the criminal proceedings under Section 276CC were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 21:02:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1792 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302812</link>
      <description>Section 276CC applies where an assessee fails to furnish a return within the prescribed time; where the return was filed belatedly but before sanction for prosecution under Section 279, and the return was later accepted and assessed, the statutory basis for launching and continuing prosecution was absent. On the admitted facts, the premise for sanction was incorrect, so the criminal proceedings under Section 276CC were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>