https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302806 Under Rule 10 of Chapter 4F(b) of Part II of the Delhi High Court Rules and clause 26 of the Letters Patent, a Division Bench that is equally divided must frame the precise point of difference and refer that point only to another Judge. A reference that merely sends the papers to the Chief Justice for assignment of a third Judge, without identifying the specific issue in dispute, does not conform to the prescribed procedure. The reference could not be expanded into a hearing on the entire case, and no finding on the merits could be returned. en-us Fri, 02 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 18:23:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302806 Under Rule 10 of Chapter 4F(b) of Part II of the Delhi High Court Rules and clause 26 of the Letters Patent, a Division Bench that is equally divided must frame the precise point of difference and refer that point only to another Judge. A reference that merely sends the papers to the Chief Justice for assignment of a third Judge, without identifying the specific issue in dispute, does not conform to the prescribed procedure. The reference could not be expanded into a hearing on the entire case, and no finding on the merits could be returned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302806