https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302803 A person in independent possession of property is not displaced by a compromise decree passed against another occupant. Where possession is shown to be held in his own right, he may resist execution under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC and seek protection in execution proceedings. Admissions by co-owners regarding tenancy and possession can support such a finding. On these facts, the conclusion that the occupant was merely a licensee under the judgment-debtor was unsustainable, and he was entitled to maintain possession and obstruct execution in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 14:57:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302803 A person in independent possession of property is not displaced by a compromise decree passed against another occupant. Where possession is shown to be held in his own right, he may resist execution under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC and seek protection in execution proceedings. Admissions by co-owners regarding tenancy and possession can support such a finding. On these facts, the conclusion that the occupant was merely a licensee under the judgment-debtor was unsustainable, and he was entitled to maintain possession and obstruct execution in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302803