<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 812 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423971</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere under Article 136 and dismissed the Special Leave Petition, holding that the amendment to Section 80IB(10) by insertion of clauses (e) and (f) did not apply to the relevant assessment year. The Court therefore left undisturbed the lower decision on the footing that the amended restriction could not govern the year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 812 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423971</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere under Article 136 and dismissed the Special Leave Petition, holding that the amendment to Section 80IB(10) by insertion of clauses (e) and (f) did not apply to the relevant assessment year. The Court therefore left undisturbed the lower decision on the footing that the amended restriction could not govern the year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>