<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423946</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for waiver of demurrage or detention charges beyond 13.01.2022, citing failure to apply for an extension within the stipulated period. While the court allowed private negotiations for concessions with the respondents from 14.01.2022 onwards, it emphasized the petitioner&#039;s responsibility for mis-declaration of goods and upheld the customs authorities&#039; actions. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 787 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423946</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for waiver of demurrage or detention charges beyond 13.01.2022, citing failure to apply for an extension within the stipulated period. While the court allowed private negotiations for concessions with the respondents from 14.01.2022 onwards, it emphasized the petitioner&#039;s responsibility for mis-declaration of goods and upheld the customs authorities&#039; actions. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>