<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302794</link>
    <description>The court quashed the show cause notice issued by DRI officials, citing lack of jurisdiction based on the Canon India Pvt. Ltd. ruling. The court ordered the refund of amounts and release of bank guarantees deposited during the investigation. The ruling clarified that the quashing of the notice does not prevent the respondents from initiating lawful proceedings. The writ petitions were granted, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302794</link>
      <description>The court quashed the show cause notice issued by DRI officials, citing lack of jurisdiction based on the Canon India Pvt. Ltd. ruling. The court ordered the refund of amounts and release of bank guarantees deposited during the investigation. The ruling clarified that the quashing of the notice does not prevent the respondents from initiating lawful proceedings. The writ petitions were granted, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>