https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302777 The Division Bench upheld its decision, citing the petitioner's delay in seeking relief and the potential impact on others' seniority and public funds. Emphasizing the need to balance individual grievances with public interest, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming the Division Bench's judgment as neither arbitrary nor illegal. The Court highlighted the importance of enforcing equality in legality, not illegality, under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and stressed the significance of timely enforcement of claims to prevent denial of relief based on delay and laches. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302777 The Division Bench upheld its decision, citing the petitioner's delay in seeking relief and the potential impact on others' seniority and public funds. Emphasizing the need to balance individual grievances with public interest, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, affirming the Division Bench's judgment as neither arbitrary nor illegal. The Court highlighted the importance of enforcing equality in legality, not illegality, under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and stressed the significance of timely enforcement of claims to prevent denial of relief based on delay and laches. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302777