<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 570 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302776</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the judgment of the Full Bench in a case concerning Reservation Policy Implementation and Roster System in Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court was reversed. The State Government was directed to reconsider the cases of the appellants and others similarly situated in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the need for promotions to general category posts based on merit rather than accelerated seniority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 570 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302776</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the judgment of the Full Bench in a case concerning Reservation Policy Implementation and Roster System in Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court was reversed. The State Government was directed to reconsider the cases of the appellants and others similarly situated in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing the need for promotions to general category posts based on merit rather than accelerated seniority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>