<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 246 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302775</link>
    <description>The case addressed the rule of reservation in promotions within the Railway service, focusing on seniority disputes between general and reserved category candidates. The court emphasized that seniority should be based on initial grade seniority and not on the date of promotion to higher grades. It was held that once reserved posts are filled, the rule of reservation should not apply further. Specific cases were discussed, with decisions emphasizing adherence to Railway Board circulars and established principles. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions, affirming that the rule of reservation should not confer seniority to reserved category candidates over later-promoted general candidates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 246 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302775</link>
      <description>The case addressed the rule of reservation in promotions within the Railway service, focusing on seniority disputes between general and reserved category candidates. The court emphasized that seniority should be based on initial grade seniority and not on the date of promotion to higher grades. It was held that once reserved posts are filled, the rule of reservation should not apply further. Specific cases were discussed, with decisions emphasizing adherence to Railway Board circulars and established principles. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions, affirming that the rule of reservation should not confer seniority to reserved category candidates over later-promoted general candidates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>