https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423922 The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging GST proceedings for alleged violation of natural justice regarding input tax credit. The petitioner claimed the notice under Rule 142(1) of GST Rules lacked transaction details, preventing proper reply. However, the court found the petitioner had already disclosed transactions with M/s V.K. Enterprises in an earlier reply dated 08.05.2019 but failed to mention these facts in the appeal memorandum. The court held the petition was misconceived and ill-founded, noting the petitioner made no formal application seeking documents and the grounds raised lacked substance. en-us Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423922 The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging GST proceedings for alleged violation of natural justice regarding input tax credit. The petitioner claimed the notice under Rule 142(1) of GST Rules lacked transaction details, preventing proper reply. However, the court found the petitioner had already disclosed transactions with M/s V.K. Enterprises in an earlier reply dated 08.05.2019 but failed to mention these facts in the appeal memorandum. The court held the petition was misconceived and ill-founded, noting the petitioner made no formal application seeking documents and the grounds raised lacked substance. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423922