<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 733 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423892</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both major issues. Firstly, it allowed depreciation on the block of assets, despite non-use during the year due to transition. Secondly, it permitted the set-off of unabsorbed brought forward depreciation and business loss, even in the absence of business activity during the year. The decisions of the CIT(A) disallowing these claims were overturned, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:36:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 733 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423892</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both major issues. Firstly, it allowed depreciation on the block of assets, despite non-use during the year due to transition. Secondly, it permitted the set-off of unabsorbed brought forward depreciation and business loss, even in the absence of business activity during the year. The decisions of the CIT(A) disallowing these claims were overturned, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>