https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423883 The High Court set aside the order dismissing the appeal and upholding the penalty imposed on the petitioner, who was the Director of the company. The Court found that there was no legal provision permitting the recovery of a penalty from Directors personally. As the adjudication order was flawed and lacked a legal basis for imposing liability on the Director, the Court quashed the order directing the petitioner to pay the penalty amount. The matter was disposed of with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423883 The High Court set aside the order dismissing the appeal and upholding the penalty imposed on the petitioner, who was the Director of the company. The Court found that there was no legal provision permitting the recovery of a penalty from Directors personally. As the adjudication order was flawed and lacked a legal basis for imposing liability on the Director, the Court quashed the order directing the petitioner to pay the penalty amount. The matter was disposed of with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423883