<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 719 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor as no Expression of Interest was received within the extended Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period exceeding 1000 days. The Committee of Creditors recommended liquidation with 100% voting shares, leading to the appointment of a Liquidator to manage the liquidation process in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Multiple Resolution Professionals were replaced during the proceedings, and the Tribunal approved each replacement. Extension requests for the CIRP period were dismissed as the order for liquidation had been passed, emphasizing adherence to the statutory timeline for insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 719 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor as no Expression of Interest was received within the extended Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period exceeding 1000 days. The Committee of Creditors recommended liquidation with 100% voting shares, leading to the appointment of a Liquidator to manage the liquidation process in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Multiple Resolution Professionals were replaced during the proceedings, and the Tribunal approved each replacement. Extension requests for the CIRP period were dismissed as the order for liquidation had been passed, emphasizing adherence to the statutory timeline for insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>