<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 718 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating the Insolvency Resolution Process against the Personal Guarantor. A moratorium was declared, staying legal actions and proceedings. The Resolution Professional was tasked with creditor notification, listing, and repayment plan preparation. The Tribunal affirmed the continued liability of the Guarantor post-Resolution Plan approval, aligning with co-extensive liability principles. The Guarantor&#039;s subrogation rights were dismissed, emphasizing the Guarantor&#039;s ongoing liability akin to the principal borrower. Recovery proceedings at the Debt Recovery Tribunal were deemed unaffected by the Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 718 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, initiating the Insolvency Resolution Process against the Personal Guarantor. A moratorium was declared, staying legal actions and proceedings. The Resolution Professional was tasked with creditor notification, listing, and repayment plan preparation. The Tribunal affirmed the continued liability of the Guarantor post-Resolution Plan approval, aligning with co-extensive liability principles. The Guarantor&#039;s subrogation rights were dismissed, emphasizing the Guarantor&#039;s ongoing liability akin to the principal borrower. Recovery proceedings at the Debt Recovery Tribunal were deemed unaffected by the Insolvency Resolution Process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>