<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 712 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423871</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held the appellant liable to pay service tax under &#039;Online Information and Data Base Access or Retrieval Service&#039; for services received. The extended period of limitation was deemed not applicable due to the appellant&#039;s registration and tax payments, leading to the allowance of the appeal. However, the Revenue&#039;s application was granted, confirming the demand for the normal limitation period based on statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 712 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423871</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held the appellant liable to pay service tax under &#039;Online Information and Data Base Access or Retrieval Service&#039; for services received. The extended period of limitation was deemed not applicable due to the appellant&#039;s registration and tax payments, leading to the allowance of the appeal. However, the Revenue&#039;s application was granted, confirming the demand for the normal limitation period based on statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>