<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423865</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief, as there was no suppression of facts or intention to evade duty. The demand raised using the extended period of limitation was deemed unsustainable. The verification report by the Range Superintendent was pivotal in establishing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief and the department&#039;s awareness of the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423865</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief, as there was no suppression of facts or intention to evade duty. The demand raised using the extended period of limitation was deemed unsustainable. The verification report by the Range Superintendent was pivotal in establishing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief and the department&#039;s awareness of the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>