<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 703 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423862</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad considered the entitlement to cenvat credit of GTA services for goods supplied from the appellant&#039;s premises to buyers&#039; premises. The key issue was whether the goods were sold on a FOR basis, as per Circular No. 988/12/2014-CX. The Tribunal emphasized determining the place of removal based on the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and set aside the order for re-examination by the original authority to ascertain if the appellant qualified for the credit under the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 703 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423862</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad considered the entitlement to cenvat credit of GTA services for goods supplied from the appellant&#039;s premises to buyers&#039; premises. The key issue was whether the goods were sold on a FOR basis, as per Circular No. 988/12/2014-CX. The Tribunal emphasized determining the place of removal based on the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and set aside the order for re-examination by the original authority to ascertain if the appellant qualified for the credit under the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>