https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423860 The court dismissed the writ petition for not being maintainable as the petitioner had not availed the alternative remedy under Section 26 of the MVAT Act. The court did not address the jurisdiction of the State of Maharashtra or the classification of contracts due to the dismissal on the grounds of maintainability. Additionally, the court noted that issues regarding the validity of Section 26 of the MVAT Act were being addressed by a Full Bench in a separate case and were not discussed in this judgment. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423860 The court dismissed the writ petition for not being maintainable as the petitioner had not availed the alternative remedy under Section 26 of the MVAT Act. The court did not address the jurisdiction of the State of Maharashtra or the classification of contracts due to the dismissal on the grounds of maintainability. Additionally, the court noted that issues regarding the validity of Section 26 of the MVAT Act were being addressed by a Full Bench in a separate case and were not discussed in this judgment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423860