https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423858 Chequebook liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not proved where the parties' arrangement had been altered and the complainant gave inconsistent evidence on delivery of possession. The court treated the changed payment terms as novation under the Contract Act and found that a legally enforceable debt was not shown to subsist when the cheque was presented. In view of these factual discrepancies and the concurrent acquittal below, revisional interference was refused and the acquittal was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423858 Chequebook liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not proved where the parties' arrangement had been altered and the complainant gave inconsistent evidence on delivery of possession. The court treated the changed payment terms as novation under the Contract Act and found that a legally enforceable debt was not shown to subsist when the cheque was presented. In view of these factual discrepancies and the concurrent acquittal below, revisional interference was refused and the acquittal was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423858