<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1396 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13, directing the AO to delete the additions made under Section 68 regarding unexplained cash credit of Rs. 1,00,00,000. The disallowance of interest on the unsecured loan was also allowed in favor of the assessee. Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) and interest under Section 234B were deemed premature or general and were not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1396 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13, directing the AO to delete the additions made under Section 68 regarding unexplained cash credit of Rs. 1,00,00,000. The disallowance of interest on the unsecured loan was also allowed in favor of the assessee. Penalties under Section 271(1)(c) and interest under Section 234B were deemed premature or general and were not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>