<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302763</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of proper satisfaction and clarity in specifying charges under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for penalty initiation. The ITAT reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision, directing the assessing officer to delete the penalty imposed on the assessee for the Assessment Year 2009-10 due to inconsistencies in the penalty initiation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302763</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of proper satisfaction and clarity in specifying charges under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for penalty initiation. The ITAT reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision, directing the assessing officer to delete the penalty imposed on the assessee for the Assessment Year 2009-10 due to inconsistencies in the penalty initiation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>