<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to tax contract receipts under Section 44BB and determine profits attributable to India operations. However, it reversed the decision on including service tax in gross receipts, ruling that service tax should not be part of taxable gross receipts under Section 44BB. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to tax contract receipts under Section 44BB and determine profits attributable to India operations. However, it reversed the decision on including service tax in gross receipts, ruling that service tax should not be part of taxable gross receipts under Section 44BB. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>