<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>More care required in adopting copy and paste method, using old format in new orders - with example of a recent short order of ITAT containing some serious mistakes.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10462</link>
    <description>Copy paste and screen based drafting practices in preparing legal orders can produce inadvertent omissions, typographical errors, and format carry overs that misstate parties, procedural posture, hearing mode, or statutory citations. Such defects may lead to wrong inferences when orders are relied upon, cause other benches to decline following earlier decisions, and harm institutional reputation. The author recommends deliberate attention to copy paste use, printed proofreading for documents with critical data, stricter review by personal secretaries and drafting staff, and rectification where ambiguities risk future confusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:41:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:41:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>More care required in adopting copy and paste method, using old format in new orders - with example of a recent short order of ITAT containing some serious mistakes.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10462</link>
      <description>Copy paste and screen based drafting practices in preparing legal orders can produce inadvertent omissions, typographical errors, and format carry overs that misstate parties, procedural posture, hearing mode, or statutory citations. Such defects may lead to wrong inferences when orders are relied upon, cause other benches to decline following earlier decisions, and harm institutional reputation. The author recommends deliberate attention to copy paste use, printed proofreading for documents with critical data, stricter review by personal secretaries and drafting staff, and rectification where ambiguities risk future confusion.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:41:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>