<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal&#039;s Error in Overturning CIT(A) Order on LTCG Claims: Penny Stock Transactions u/s 263 Scrutiny.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64100</link>
    <description>Bogus LTCG - genuine v/s sham transaction - burden of proof - penny stock purchases - colourable devices adopted in the process or not? - The assessee cannot take shelter under the opinion given by the experts as it is not the expert who has indulged in the transaction but it is the assessee. - the Tribunal committed a serious error in setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) who had affirmed the orders of the Assessing Officer and equally the Tribunal committed a serious error both on law and fact in interfering with the assumption of jurisdiction by the Commissioner under Section 263 - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:36:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal&#039;s Error in Overturning CIT(A) Order on LTCG Claims: Penny Stock Transactions u/s 263 Scrutiny.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64100</link>
      <description>Bogus LTCG - genuine v/s sham transaction - burden of proof - penny stock purchases - colourable devices adopted in the process or not? - The assessee cannot take shelter under the opinion given by the experts as it is not the expert who has indulged in the transaction but it is the assessee. - the Tribunal committed a serious error in setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) who had affirmed the orders of the Assessing Officer and equally the Tribunal committed a serious error both on law and fact in interfering with the assumption of jurisdiction by the Commissioner under Section 263 - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:36:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>