<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 689 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the notice failed to specify the charge. Imposition of penalty was deemed unjustified as the mistake was inadvertent, corrected voluntarily, and lacked evidence of deliberate concealment. Penalty of Rs. 2,04,372/- was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 689 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the notice failed to specify the charge. Imposition of penalty was deemed unjustified as the mistake was inadvertent, corrected voluntarily, and lacked evidence of deliberate concealment. Penalty of Rs. 2,04,372/- was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>