<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the Rs. 55,00,000/- addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, as the revenue failed to substantiate the claim with adequate evidence. The decision emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for additions based on seized documents, aligning with judicial precedents that discourage reliance on standalone loose papers for such purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the Rs. 55,00,000/- addition under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, as the revenue failed to substantiate the claim with adequate evidence. The decision emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for additions based on seized documents, aligning with judicial precedents that discourage reliance on standalone loose papers for such purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>