https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423839 Where sunset review findings had already been rendered under Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Rule 23 of the Anti-dumping Rules, the competent authority could be directed to take a decision expeditiously and in accordance with law. The challenge to the impugned notification was not pressed after it was stated that the notification had not been published in the e-Gazette and had no legal effect. The court therefore issued a limited direction requiring a decision within ten days, while leaving the merits of the dispute open. en-us Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423839 Where sunset review findings had already been rendered under Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with Rule 23 of the Anti-dumping Rules, the competent authority could be directed to take a decision expeditiously and in accordance with law. The challenge to the impugned notification was not pressed after it was stated that the notification had not been published in the e-Gazette and had no legal effect. The court therefore issued a limited direction requiring a decision within ten days, while leaving the merits of the dispute open. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423839