https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423833 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's claim for a refund of the pre-deposit amount under Section 35F, rejecting the grounds of rejection based on the recovery notice and unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the distinction between pre-deposits and duty payments, ensuring the appellant's entitlement to the refund along with interest, in line with legal provisions and precedents. en-us Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:14:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423833 The Tribunal upheld the appellant's claim for a refund of the pre-deposit amount under Section 35F, rejecting the grounds of rejection based on the recovery notice and unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the distinction between pre-deposits and duty payments, ensuring the appellant's entitlement to the refund along with interest, in line with legal provisions and precedents. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423833