<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 673 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423832</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties for non-appearance and certain tax components. Tax liabilities on specific items were upheld, including depot charges as taxable under service tax. Cenvat credit was allowed, and penalty amounts were reduced due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with tax obligations and proper account maintenance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 673 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423832</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties for non-appearance and certain tax components. Tax liabilities on specific items were upheld, including depot charges as taxable under service tax. Cenvat credit was allowed, and penalty amounts were reduced due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with tax obligations and proper account maintenance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>