https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423831 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disallowance of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 2,76,650 was not justified. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable as the appellant maintained regular books of accounts and filed returns, with no suppression or contumacious conduct found. The Tribunal considered the appellant's compliance with audits and records maintenance, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:14:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423831 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the disallowance of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 2,76,650 was not justified. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable as the appellant maintained regular books of accounts and filed returns, with no suppression or contumacious conduct found. The Tribunal considered the appellant's compliance with audits and records maintenance, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423831