<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1944 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302748</link>
    <description>Departmental income tax appeals were treated as barred where the assessed tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular. The circular dated 11-7-2018 was applied retrospectively, with the result that appeals not exceeding the threshold were not to be filed. On that basis, the High Court held the appeal not maintainable for low tax effect and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 20:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1944 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302748</link>
      <description>Departmental income tax appeals were treated as barred where the assessed tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular. The circular dated 11-7-2018 was applied retrospectively, with the result that appeals not exceeding the threshold were not to be filed. On that basis, the High Court held the appeal not maintainable for low tax effect and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>