<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 15 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29214</link>
    <description>No reference could be directed under section 256(2) where the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee had not been given a reasonable opportunity in rectification proceedings was a finding of fact, and the matters sought to be reopened under section 154 were debatable rather than errors apparent on the record. On that basis, no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the Revenue&#039;s application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 15 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29214</link>
      <description>No reference could be directed under section 256(2) where the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee had not been given a reasonable opportunity in rectification proceedings was a finding of fact, and the matters sought to be reopened under section 154 were debatable rather than errors apparent on the record. On that basis, no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the Revenue&#039;s application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>