<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423814</link>
    <description>An order passed on the same day as the notice, while the notice itself required appearance on a later date, deprived the affected party of a meaningful hearing. The record showed that the authority decided the matter before the party could be heard, which violated the principles of natural justice. The Gujarat HC therefore held the impugned order unsustainable and quashed it, directing fresh consideration after granting an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423814</link>
      <description>An order passed on the same day as the notice, while the notice itself required appearance on a later date, deprived the affected party of a meaningful hearing. The record showed that the authority decided the matter before the party could be heard, which violated the principles of natural justice. The Gujarat HC therefore held the impugned order unsustainable and quashed it, directing fresh consideration after granting an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>