<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29211</link>
    <description>For reopening under Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessee must disclose fully and truly all primary and material facts relevant to assessment, and mere production of books of account does not automatically discharge that duty. Whether disclosure was full and true depends on the nature of the facts and surrounding circumstances, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding on non-disclosure is ordinarily a finding of fact unless shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. On the facts found, the assessee had not drawn the Income-tax Officer&#039;s attention to material matters sufficient to bar reassessment, so the reassessment was held valid in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:05:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 12 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29211</link>
      <description>For reopening under Section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessee must disclose fully and truly all primary and material facts relevant to assessment, and mere production of books of account does not automatically discharge that duty. Whether disclosure was full and true depends on the nature of the facts and surrounding circumstances, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding on non-disclosure is ordinarily a finding of fact unless shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. On the facts found, the assessee had not drawn the Income-tax Officer&#039;s attention to material matters sufficient to bar reassessment, so the reassessment was held valid in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>