<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 642 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the AO did not provide sufficient evidence to prove an arrangement resulting in more than ordinary profits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Revenue to substantiate claims of tax avoidance with concrete evidence and upheld the relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 642 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the AO did not provide sufficient evidence to prove an arrangement resulting in more than ordinary profits. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the Revenue to substantiate claims of tax avoidance with concrete evidence and upheld the relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>