<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1641 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application filed by the assessee, directing them to deposit Rs.20 crores in two installments within specified deadlines. The Tribunal found that the employees who received benefits were not managers or trustees, and therefore did not violate section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was adjourned for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1641 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application filed by the assessee, directing them to deposit Rs.20 crores in two installments within specified deadlines. The Tribunal found that the employees who received benefits were not managers or trustees, and therefore did not violate section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was adjourned for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>