https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302727 At the stage of framing charge or while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, the court cannot assess the truth, sufficiency, or acceptability of prosecution material as though conducting a trial; it may only ask whether the material, if accepted as true, discloses an offence. On that basis, quashing a charge under Section 304 Part II IPC on a premature evaluation was impermissible and was set aside. The question whether the alleged act discloses Section 304 Part II or only Section 304A IPC was left to the trial court, which retains power to alter or modify the charge at any appropriate stage on the evidence adduced. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:43:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302727 At the stage of framing charge or while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, the court cannot assess the truth, sufficiency, or acceptability of prosecution material as though conducting a trial; it may only ask whether the material, if accepted as true, discloses an offence. On that basis, quashing a charge under Section 304 Part II IPC on a premature evaluation was impermissible and was set aside. The question whether the alleged act discloses Section 304 Part II or only Section 304A IPC was left to the trial court, which retains power to alter or modify the charge at any appropriate stage on the evidence adduced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302727