<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Finds Violation of GST Act Section 129(3) Due to Lack of Notice After Vehicle Seizure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64057</link>
    <description>Detention/seizure of vehicle alongwith the goods - the provisions of Section 129 (3) require the proper officer detaining or seizing the goods to issue a notice specifying the penalty payable and thereafter pass an order within 7 days from the date of service of the notice in relation to the detention/seizure effected - In the present case, admittedly, no such notice has been issued till date though the seizure has been effected as early as on 30.05.2022 - In the aforesaid circumstances, the act of the respondent in insisting that the petitioner retain the vehicle at the present location is in gross contravention of the statutory provisions. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:30:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Finds Violation of GST Act Section 129(3) Due to Lack of Notice After Vehicle Seizure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64057</link>
      <description>Detention/seizure of vehicle alongwith the goods - the provisions of Section 129 (3) require the proper officer detaining or seizing the goods to issue a notice specifying the penalty payable and thereafter pass an order within 7 days from the date of service of the notice in relation to the detention/seizure effected - In the present case, admittedly, no such notice has been issued till date though the seizure has been effected as early as on 30.05.2022 - In the aforesaid circumstances, the act of the respondent in insisting that the petitioner retain the vehicle at the present location is in gross contravention of the statutory provisions. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:30:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>