<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 594 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and verified the details provided by the assessee, indicating that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. As a result, the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 594 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was determined that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and verified the details provided by the assessee, indicating that the AO&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. As a result, the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT&#039;s order and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>