https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423745 Repayment of the underlying loan does not by itself bar a money-laundering complaint where the allegations concern concealment, layering, integration and projection of proceeds of crime under the PMLA, because the offence is treated as continuing. A prior FIR and charge-sheet for IPC offences do not attract double jeopardy when the complaint is founded on the distinct statutory offence of money-laundering with different ingredients. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld on the basis that the acts were connected with the relevant branch transaction and fell within the Special Court's area. Cognizance was also sustained because the complaint was filed by a public servant acting in discharge of official duty, making examination under Sections 200 and 202 CrPC unnecessary. en-us Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423745 Repayment of the underlying loan does not by itself bar a money-laundering complaint where the allegations concern concealment, layering, integration and projection of proceeds of crime under the PMLA, because the offence is treated as continuing. A prior FIR and charge-sheet for IPC offences do not attract double jeopardy when the complaint is founded on the distinct statutory offence of money-laundering with different ingredients. Territorial jurisdiction was upheld on the basis that the acts were connected with the relevant branch transaction and fell within the Special Court's area. Cognizance was also sustained because the complaint was filed by a public servant acting in discharge of official duty, making examination under Sections 200 and 202 CrPC unnecessary. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423745