https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302715 The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them injunction against interference with their possession of the property. The court emphasized the plaintiffs' established title and possession, noting the defendants' failure to challenge the sale deeds or provide sufficient evidence to dispute the plaintiffs' claims. The court highlighted the significance of mutation entries in revenue records but clarified that they do not confer ownership rights. The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the decree in favor of the plaintiffs and disposing of related applications. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:44:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302715 The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them injunction against interference with their possession of the property. The court emphasized the plaintiffs' established title and possession, noting the defendants' failure to challenge the sale deeds or provide sufficient evidence to dispute the plaintiffs' claims. The court highlighted the significance of mutation entries in revenue records but clarified that they do not confer ownership rights. The second appeal was dismissed, affirming the decree in favor of the plaintiffs and disposing of related applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302715