<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order under Section 153A read with Section 143(3), dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge based on the operation of multiple benami concerns. It found the pen drive seized during the search admissible, as its contents matched handwritten estimation sheets linking to unaccounted commission income. The Tribunal adjusted the estimation rates for various income sources and directed the AO to recalculate income. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 was affirmed, except for AY 2007-08. The addition for unexplained jewellery was deleted after reconciliation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on multiple grounds, leading to a mixed outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order under Section 153A read with Section 143(3), dismissing the assessee&#039;s challenge based on the operation of multiple benami concerns. It found the pen drive seized during the search admissible, as its contents matched handwritten estimation sheets linking to unaccounted commission income. The Tribunal adjusted the estimation rates for various income sources and directed the AO to recalculate income. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 was affirmed, except for AY 2007-08. The addition for unexplained jewellery was deleted after reconciliation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the assessee on multiple grounds, leading to a mixed outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>