https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302709 The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, setting aside previous orders and directing the Subordinate Judge to reevaluate the insolvency application. The petitioner, as a creditor holding a decree against the 2nd respondent, was deemed eligible to file the application. The court determined the registration date as crucial for the timing of the act of insolvency initiation. The case was remanded for further assessment of the alleged act of insolvency involving property transfer to the 1st respondent, emphasizing the need for a detailed review of evidence. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:24:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302709 The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, setting aside previous orders and directing the Subordinate Judge to reevaluate the insolvency application. The petitioner, as a creditor holding a decree against the 2nd respondent, was deemed eligible to file the application. The court determined the registration date as crucial for the timing of the act of insolvency initiation. The case was remanded for further assessment of the alleged act of insolvency involving property transfer to the 1st respondent, emphasizing the need for a detailed review of evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302709