<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707</link>
    <description>Revenue authorities dealing with mutation entries under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code may only record, certify and update fiscal entries, and may consider possession incidentally where necessary. They cannot adjudicate ownership, tenancy or other substantive rights in immovable property, which must be decided by the competent civil or special forum. Orders by appellate or revisional revenue authorities that went beyond this limited inquiry and interfered with mutation supported by a registered sale deed were held to be in excess of jurisdiction and were quashed. Substantive rights were left to be worked out before the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 758 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707</link>
      <description>Revenue authorities dealing with mutation entries under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code may only record, certify and update fiscal entries, and may consider possession incidentally where necessary. They cannot adjudicate ownership, tenancy or other substantive rights in immovable property, which must be decided by the competent civil or special forum. Orders by appellate or revisional revenue authorities that went beyond this limited inquiry and interfered with mutation supported by a registered sale deed were held to be in excess of jurisdiction and were quashed. Substantive rights were left to be worked out before the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>