https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707 The Court quashed the orders of the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Additional Commissioner, reinstating the Tahsildar's decision to allow the petitioners' mutation entry based on the registered sale deed. Revenue authorities were reminded to limit their actions to record updates and not adjudicate property rights, which fall under civil courts' jurisdiction. The stay on proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay Agricultural Tenancy Act was lifted, and the petition was granted without costs. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:14:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707 The Court quashed the orders of the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Additional Commissioner, reinstating the Tahsildar's decision to allow the petitioners' mutation entry based on the registered sale deed. Revenue authorities were reminded to limit their actions to record updates and not adjudicate property rights, which fall under civil courts' jurisdiction. The stay on proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay Agricultural Tenancy Act was lifted, and the petition was granted without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302707